It was a long and hard-fought journey at the 9th circuit court of appeals, where government lawyers appealed a previous court’s stay of the travel ban. The decision by the appeals court to continue to stay of the executive order is unprecedented and the court’s ruling was unanimous, stating that the government gave no security purpose for the ban, among other things. The Outline has a good rundown of the proceedings if you weren’t able to follow along live and The New York Times reports on the defeat.
Bloomberg’s Sahil Kapur tweeted about the ruling, but paid particular attention to the conclusion, which reads:
In short, although courts owe considerable deference to the President’s policy determinations with respect to immigration and national security, it is beyond question that the federal judiciary retains the authority to adjudicate constitutional challenges to executive action.
Here is a link to the full 29-page brief, which I wanted to link to because it includes many new precedents; Section IV includes the above quote and starts on page thirteen.
After everything that happened with Coretta Scott King’s letter, the fact that Jeff Sessions was confirmed for the role of Attorney General makes it seem like nothing will stop any of the president’s terrible picks from moving forward. The 52-47 vote was mostly along party lines with one Democrat (Sen. Joe Manchin, up for reelection in 2018) joining the Republicans, but specifics matter less than the fact that Sessions has a history of disconcerting civil rights positions and documented “racial insensitivity”. Here are a few resources on the situation:
Did the Internet community peak at bookmarks? Asked in a different and perhaps more complete way: just as technologies like RSS and email in their purest forms are hard to beat even as technology marches forward, what better technology exists to keep track of information on the ever-expanding Internet than bookmarks? Taken a step further, what better way to share the bookmarked information than a site of your own? As such, I‘ve been reading, which is why I write now.
Working in and having a passion for libraries, I am struck by the fact that the way bookmarks work in the physical world is not directly analogous to bookmarks in the digital world. Bookmarks in the digital world are instead like dog-eared pages or highlighted passages; if you think of the Internet as a single tome, that is. In any case, anything that moves you to deface a book should probably be shared or become immortalized in some other way than just a reference for a future version of yourself.