I got a lot of great feedback from last week’s article; I even got mentioned on Jim Dalrymple’s The Loop! I had fun writing that piece because Mavericks seems to be a hot topic in the tech industry right now, complete with articles by Matt Panzarino at The Next Web, the aforementioned Loop articles, and others. Nevertheless, I wanted to follow-up with a few thoughts that were brought up in the feedback process and this week’s The Talk Show with John Gruber.
@JayRay Re: tags. A thought I have been mulling is how tags could compliment filetype as way for iOS apps to share documents. Thoughts?
Thanks for the thought, Jack! I replied that I would have to answer in a longer form since that question is loaded! So here are my thoughts.
Last week, I discussed the possibility of a future tagging implementation within Apple’s mobile operating system, giving way to the possibility of a shared system by which a user’s documents could be accessed—much like the current Photos implementation—by any app that uses a built-in API. I also mentioned briefly how tags could communicate file type/originating application to make the experience better for the user in that only the compatible file types show up when accessed.
John Gruber discussed something similar on this week’s The Talk Show, where John and Craig Hockenberry discuss many topics but ended with a discussion of tags, starting at 1:23:24.
This is the way around iCloud sandboxing.
-John Gruber, The Talk Show, Episode 46, 1:23:56
Something I hadn’t even remotely thought about was how tags interacted with iCloud when crossing sandboxed application boundaries within the OS. In other words, tag something in TextEdit and save to iCloud, open that tag in a Finder window, and open that iCloud-saved document in another application.
After further testing, I found that I could create a document in iCloud using TextEdit, then open that file from Finder with (shudder) Microsoft Word. Now, because Word has not been updated to support iCloud’s Documents in the Cloud, I could not use the “Open…” dialogue to access the document, but “Open with…” in Finder worked without a hitch. I was even able to save the document within Word and have the edits appear in TextEdit at next launch.
Which gets me back to my original follow-up point: Tags in iOS. If nothing else, the realization of this hand-off capability has strengthened my case for an iOS implementation of tags moving forward, although I believe that Apple will deemphasize file extensions to promote filetypes and tags, as Jack Wellborn suggests. The implementation specifics aside, I stand by my statement that “Photos” on iOS and “All My Files” on OS X show us the ideal way that files might be accessed and arranged in iOS for use across multiple applications.
Here is a hypothetical scenario:
Open iA Writer and begin writing a new document.
When saving the document, the user is prompted to tag it.
If the user also uses another text editor, they can open that app, grant access to their iCloud documents, and search by tag (if used) or originating application.
As I said previously, Mavericks is an educational step for Apple to communicate that Tags are the future of document storage and information architecture. iOS will come next but it has to be foolproof, which is where Jack’s idea comes in. The fact is that users will not warm up to tags, unless some of the work is done for them. Tags have to be built into the document saving process with default tags being added based on file type, originating application, and creation statistics such as date, at least. If the proper amount of hand-holding doesn’t take place, the average user will never use it. However, I think the moment a user creates a new text document and the file type, tags, and other metadata allow them to quickly access said file from any device and application, the majority of people will be sold on the idea.
Did the Internet community peak at bookmarks? Asked in a different and perhaps more complete way: just as technologies like RSS and email in their purest forms are hard to beat even as technology marches forward, what better technology exists to keep track of information on the ever-expanding Internet than bookmarks? Taken a step further, what better way to share the bookmarked information than a site of your own? As such, I‘ve been reading, which is why I write now.
Working in and having a passion for libraries, I am struck by the fact that the way bookmarks work in the physical world is not directly analogous to bookmarks in the digital world. Bookmarks in the digital world are instead like dog-eared pages or highlighted passages; if you think of the Internet as a single tome, that is. In any case, anything that moves you to deface a book should probably be shared or become immortalized in some other way than just a reference for a future version of yourself.