I have now seen Avatar in 3D. While my wife was deep in thought about the religious ideas portrayed in the film, I was lost in the technology of the third dimension, expertly created by the usually overrated director, James Cameron. Check out my thoughts after the break.
3D is no longer the based on the gags of The Christmas Carol in 3D. When Shrek Forever After comes out with the same stuff of old, flying brooms coming out of the screen and such, Avatar has decided to create a functional use for the technology. I was taken aback at the depths I saw into every scene. It is clear that the creators of Avatar took the nature of the technology to the next level. Heres how I know:
As an engineer, I took my glasses off at times to see what made me see the images on the screen. Not every thing in every scene was blurred for the 3D effect. In fact, at times, only one piece (a character, a tree, or otherwise) was given depth in order to portray, for lack of a better term, depth. I was astounding to see the deep forest literally looked fifty feet behind the screen. There was nothing gaudy about the experience, nothing that made me wonder why I spent the extra couple dollars to see it in 3D.
I suggest that everyone who sees the movie see it at least once in the third dimension. For those who don’t know, 3D is an old technology. It is based on manipulating the images that your eyes perceive. There are two images superimposed and slightly offset. The glasses, although there are 3D technologies that don’t use glasses (check out Wikipedia to learn more), help your eyes to focus correctly on the images to make them appear to extend into the screen. The cool thing about Avatar was its use of offsets to create further depth. The further offset the superimposed images were, the deeper they looked. For the engineer in me, this meant there was an entire separate piece to the technology that was underrated and thereby underutilized; it meant that there were quite an infinite number depth levels that could be created with the normal number of limitations. I’ll let you think on that while I move onto an interesting story arc…
SPOILER ALERT! DO NOT READ ON IF YOU DON’T WANT TO KNOW THE ENDING!
I want to defer now to what I took away from the film, which includes the need to spoil it a bit… We lose! I wondered how many people around me realized that though they were rooting for the underdog of the film, we (humans, americans, what-have-you) were the douchebags! At first, I thought, “Well, it is always about our capitalist tendancies, isn’t it?” I quickly realized that whether or not Cameron was trying to make a point about military might not always being the answer, but understanding being the key, the fact is that Avatar was exactly that. The military has their heads up their asses and it is time to change the way we go about getting our valuable resources… Cameron says.
Either way, I come to a crossroads in my judgement of 3D Technology. I can’t say succinctly enough the hatred I had for 3D technology prior to seeing this movie. I disliked the gags and saw no reason why I should be jealous of those who saw that version when I saw the 2D version. I liked Christmas Carol in 2D why spend extra to see it in any other form. Not so with Avatar, which would simply not be the same experience in any other form. I will be a proponent of the technology from now on, as long as filmmakers take it as seriously as James Cameron has.
P.S. I will never be a proponent of James Cameron, though!
Did the Internet community peak at bookmarks? Asked in a different and perhaps more complete way: just as technologies like RSS and email in their purest forms are hard to beat even as technology marches forward, what better technology exists to keep track of information on the ever-expanding Internet than bookmarks? Taken a step further, what better way to share the bookmarked information than a site of your own? As such, I‘ve been reading, which is why I write now.
Working in and having a passion for libraries, I am struck by the fact that the way bookmarks work in the physical world is not directly analogous to bookmarks in the digital world. Bookmarks in the digital world are instead like dog-eared pages or highlighted passages; if you think of the Internet as a single tome, that is. In any case, anything that moves you to deface a book should probably be shared or become immortalized in some other way than just a reference for a future version of yourself.